…it sucked. See below.
LawBot
Hi, I’m LawBot, a robot lawyer designed to help you through this situation. Please tell me your name or say anonymous if you would rather not.
Dude
LawBot
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
How old are you?
You
LawBot
If you don’t understand what I am asking you, just say so and I will try to explain. Are you ready to start?
You
LawBot
Are you ready to start?
You
LawBot
Are you ready to start?
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
The law would define anyone without a vagina as male. Are you male?
You
LawBot
The law would define anyone without a vagina as male. Are you male?
You
LawBot
Was your anus or mouth penetrated by the person’s penis?
You
LawBot
Partial insertion even if only briefly still counts. Was your anus or mouth penetrated by the person’s penis?
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
1. Sex Offences;
2. Injuries and Assault;
3. Harassment;
4. Property Offences;
5. None of these.
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
If you don’t understand what I am asking you, just say so and I will try to explain. Are you ready to start?
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
Was your anus or mouth penetrated by the person’s penis?
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
You
LawBot
You
[divider]
My favorite part is probably when it asked “Are you male?” I replied yes, and it said “I’m terribly sorry about that.” Also, if you’re going to have a robot give out advice, it should probably be able to spell ‘accordingly’ correctly. As with any automated/computer system, the key phrase to keep in mind is GIGO. It doesn’t matter how great a system is if you what goes in it is garbage.
I’m not against AI. I’ve demoed AI research systems and thought they were good. But we’re years away from a legal chatbot being robust enough to actually be more than a novelty.
Anyway, you can read a story about the AI here, or try it yourself here. If you have an amusing experience, please share below.
[divider]
Update:
- Over at Popehat, Ken had an amusing experience with the “lawbot” as well.
- So did Chris at Mediation is Dead.